Arizona Court Rules on Illegal Immigration Law

If you were wondering why there have been no blogs, we have moved our home and office in the last 2 months.  Our new office address is 322 Brooks Street in Sugar Land, Texas.  Same phone, e-mail and fax.   So it is time to get back to blogging and working.

So let’s start off with something non controversial.  Today a Court in Arizona   ruled that several of the provisions of the illegal immigration law may not be enacted.  The order includes several of the provisions?    Including:

Not being able to require police officers to determine the immigration status of anyone they stop or arrest.

Not requiring immigrants to carry immigration registration papers; and

Not making it a crime for an illegal immigrant to seek or perform work.

You can cut and paste the link below for the entire ruling.   http://azd.uscourts.gov/azd/courtinfo.nsf/983700DFEE44B56B0725776E005D6CCB/$file/10-1413-87.pdf?openelement

This is just the first step in litigation that will probably end up in the U.S. Supreme Court.   We have the Court’s ruling, what do you think?

Drunk Driving & Texting Driving

Last week a 14 year old girl was killed and her brother and sister severely injured when a 23 year old college student ran into the rear of their stopped car. He was drunk.
Also last week a jury returned a $21.8 million dollar verdict against a A&M senior for killing a 21 year old Baylor student. The driver was texting at time and crossed into the oncoming lane of traffic.
Last month we obtained a $3.2 million dollar judgment against a drunk driver in Brazoria County.
Also last month a friend and fellow soccer referee was paralyzed when a 19 year old girl ran a stop sign and crashed into him. It is unknown at this time why she did not stop.
Every day we hear of senseless death and injuries being caused by people driving drunk or texting. The criminal courts prosecute them. Our firm sues the people that cause these wrecks and injuries so that the families can pay their bills and get some compensate for the damage caused, but what else can be done?
I would like to see anyone who is convicted of drunk driving or texting while driving have to spend at least 3 days helping one of the people hurt by those type of actions. That would include cleaning bed pans, changing sheets, feeding them, cleaning the grave site or whatever the family needs. Make their actions real. Even if they were lucky enough not to hurt or kill anyone they should see what can and does happen. I would also require them to spend a visiting hour with a prisoner who was convicted of injuring or killing someone while drunk or texting so they have a real appreciation for what could happen to them. This should be required before any probation, etc., but that’s just me.
What do you think?

Health Care Subrogation

Subrogation (in an injury claim) is where your group health coverage can recover the money they paid out for your medical care caused by the actions of someone else (the other driver in a car wreck). Sounds fair doesn’t it. Why should your insurance have to pay for the bills caused by the person that hit you. Let’s look at that.
You have paid premiums for that coverage to provide you health care when you need it regardless of how you were injured or became ill. You are now in a wreck and need medical attention. You go to your doctor, one referred by the hospital or by a friend. When you go to your appointment (or when you call in) they ask you what happened and you tell them you were in a car wreck. At this point there are doctors our there who will tell you they don’t treat car wreck injuries. If you hurt your back lifting something no problem, but a injured back from a car wreck, sorry no. This despite the fact that you have group coverage to pay the bills. (This will be the subject of another blog) You get a doctor who agrees to see you and they take down your insurance information. Let’s call it Metua. You pay your co-pay and they send the bills to Metua. Metua pays at a “contracted” rate which means the doctor gets significantly less than their normal rate. You get better and are ready to try and settle your case. You have $9,000.00 in medical bills and $1,500.00 in lost wages so you sent the insurance company of the person that hit you a letter saying I am ready to settle give me a call. They send you an offer of $3,500.00. What??? You have $10,500.00 in medical bills and lost wages not counting all the stuff you missed out on and pain because of the wreck. You call up the adjuster and ask how they came up with that crazy number. They tell you. Metua send them a subrogation notice which set out all of your medical care and bills for the wreck, but because of their contract the actual amount they paid was only $1,500.00 of the $9,000.00 so they offered you that plus a $1,000.00 for the lost wages (they thought you should have gone back sooner) and the rest was for pain and suffering. They even offer to send you the information that Metua sent them. You get it and it shows your itemized treatment with the billing from the date of the wreck. Not just the amounts, but who the doctors were and the treatment. Your personal medical information was just handed over to a person who represents a person who hit you in a wreck. You call Metua and they explain they have a right under your policy to subrogation and they were just protecting themselves by letting the other party know how much they were owed. You ask if they will cut down their claim so that you can at least clear something (after all your co-pays). They say no our policy allows us to get every penny back even if you have an attorney (not necessarily true).

So the upshot of this is your health care company provides personal medical information to someone other than you. They paid your doctor significantly less than their normal rate. They undermined your case by providing information to the other side which they were not entitled to. Essentially you have paid premiums for all those years so that the person who hits you gets the benefit. In Texas our legislature approved this with the “paid v. incurred” argument that only the amount actually paid (the reduced rate) should have to be paid by the other party. So if a drunk hits you, he gets the benefit of all those years of premiums you paid for health insurance. Is that right? What do you think about your health insurance giving out your private information to an opposing party? The information they provided could include information not related to the wreck at all (prescriptions, other treatments, etc.) but just happens to be after the date of the wreck.

$3,250,000.00 Judgment in Drunk Driver case

The drunk driver had prior DUI’s and one DUI after he hit our client.  He was excluded from the insurance on the truck according to the insurance company,  so no coverage. It is clear that jail does not seem to change his attitude; hopefully a multimillion dollar judgment against him will convince him to stop drinking and driving.

We have previously proposed anyone convicted of a DUI be required to have and maintain insurance coverage of at least $100k to get their license back and have an interlock in their car.   If they are stopped and found not to have valid coverage it would be a probation violation.  The combination of an interlock and  insurance coverage can not stop them from driving drunk, but it would hopefully make it more difficult and provide the people they injure with some compensation for their injuries.

Driving while drunk is not always some other guy or other family.  Driving drunk not only can hurt others, but can have serious life changing impacts on the your life, including being arrested, losing your job and having a criminal conviction.  Think before you drink and drive.

What are your thoughts?

Arbitration vs. Mediation

Arbitration is evil.  Mediation is good.  Is that clear enough.   In arbitration you are putting your legal issues before a person(s) who charge a bunch of money and make a decision which you can not appeal, which may be wrong, and may not even follow the law.  While it may be the only time you are before that arbitrator the other side may have been before them several times and as arbitrators can be stricken by a party how would you feel knowing that the decision on your case will be made by someone who knows that your opponent will be back in the future and he may never see you again.

Mediation is a voluntary settlement conference where both parties meet with a neutral person in an attempt to come to an agreement.  Neither side can be forced to settle and the mediator does not make a decision which can be forced on you.   If you don’t settle the case in mediation, you can continue on to trial and nothing is allowed to be discussed about the mediation, what was said or done.  It is as if it never happened.  Mediation has about a 85% success rate for settlement.

Nicole Lalime 13 year old killed by drunk driver

A year ago today, December 16, 2008, a drunk driver, Mr. John Winne hit and killed a 13 year Nicole Lalime as she got off her school bus in front of her home. After hitting her he left her in the street and fled the scene.  The world is a sadder place because of someone who decided to drive drunk.  You can help stop drunk driving.   Take the keys or take a cab, but don’t allow drunk driving.

[youtube=http://youtube.com/watch?v=5W-EFPIh5eA]